A new book written by a former FBI consultant
claims that al-Qaida not only has obtained nuclear devices,
but also likely has them in the U.S. and will detonate
them in the near future.
These
chilling allegations appear in "Osama's Revenge:
The Next 9/11: What the Media and the Government Haven't
Told You," by Paul L. Williams (Prometheus Books).
Williams claims that al-Qaida has been planning a spectacular
nuclear attack using six or seven suitcase nuclear bombs
that would be detonated simulantaneously in U.S. cities.
"They want the most bang for the
buck, and that is nuclear," Williams told NewsMax.
"I expect such an attack would come
between now and the end of 2005," the author said.
In addition to writing several books on
terrorism, Williams, an investigative journalist, has
worked as an FBI consultant.
Williams' contention is not far from what
U.S. intelligence believes, a source close to Homeland
Security Secretary Tom Ridge has told NewsMax. The source
said Ridge claimed that U.S. intelligence believes terrorists
already have smuggled into the U.S. actual atomic devices,
as opposed to so-called "dirty nukes" that simply
are conventional bombs that help spread radiation.
The Bush administration has warned for
years that terrorists pose a nuclear threat to America.
Williams' book presents a review of the
increasing spread of nuclear weapons technology, which
the author says can be traced to India's nuclear tests
in the early 1970s. It accelerated when the Soviet Union
collapsed in 1991.
Shortly after the Indian nuclear tests,
Pakistan made an all-out effort to join the nuclear club,
the author says. Islamabad received help from sympathetic
nations, namely China and North Korea.
Williams traces the rampant spread of
nuclear bomb development to a leading Pakistani scientist,
Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan.
Khan, described as an "Islamic extremist,"
also has been depicted by former CIA chief George Tenet
as "the father of Pakistan's nuclear program."
It is believed the Pakistani gained his
expertise while working in the Netherlands, where he allegedly
stole technology used in uranium reprocessing, a key procedure
for building an atomic bomb.
Pakistan successfully detonated two nuclear
weapons inside a northern mountain range in the late 1990s.
Khan, arrested by Pakistani police in
February under White House pressure, admitted selling
nuclear technology to numerous foreign countries, including
North Korea and Libya.
Williams reports that Wall Street Journal
reporter Daniel Pearl was investigating Khan at the time
he was kidnapped and later killed in 2003.
Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf,
fearing a backlash from radical Muslims, granted Khan
a pardon but restricted his travels.
According to Williams, another beneficiary
of Khan's "contacts" was al-Qaida. The author
reports that the U.S. got its first "hard" evidence
of a connection when it invaded the Afghan capital of
Kabul in 2001.
A former al-Qaida safe house was found
to be loaded with documents detailing dealings with the
Pakistani scientist.
The finding was so serious, says Williams,
that Tenet traveled to Afghanistan and Pakistan to follow
up on the discovery.
Tenet: 'They Are Coming'
Perhaps it was such intelligence that
led Tenet to say in October 2002: "The threat environment
we face is as bad as it was before September 11. It is
serious. They have reconstituted. They are coming after
us."
Almost from the moment 9/11 happened,
the U.S. has been on a heightened state of alert and worry
over the possible use of nuclear weapons. On the day of
the attack, President Bush left Florida and began criss-crossing
the country in Air Force One in maneuvers consistent with
a president preparing for a nuclear attack.
Shortly after Sept. 11, Taliban leader
Mullah Omar claimed to the BBC that the main intent of
al-Qaida was the "bigger cause," which he described
as the "destruction of America."
Asked pointedly if this meant the use
of nuclear weapons againt the U.S., he responded: "This
is not a matter of weapons. We are hopeful for God's help.
The real matter is the extinction of America. And, God
willing, it will fall to the ground."
Omar cryptically suggested that a nuclear
plan was already under way at the time of Sept. 11.
He said: "The plan is going ahead
and, God willing, it is being implemented. But it is a
huge task, which is beyond the will and comprehension
of human beings. If God's help is with us, this will happen
within a short period of time; keep in mind this prediction."
The Russian Connection
The author points out that the collapse
of the Soviet Union in 1991 made matters worse:
"The Chechen Mafia reportedly sold
twenty nuclear suitcases in Grozny to representatives
of Osama bin Laden and the Mujahadeen [in 1996]. For their
weapons, bin Laden paid $30 million in cash and two tons
of heroin."
Al-Qaida's leader, says Williams, is a
major drug producer and runner in Afghanistan.
"It is the drug money, not the bin
Laden family fortune, that is the financial engine for
al-Qaida," he points out.
Today, Williams says, more than 40 Russian
"nuclear suitcases" cannot be accounted for.
The suitcases are miniaturized tactical
nuclear bombs (in some cases weighing less than 40 pounds)
that originally were planned by the Cold War-era Kremlin
to be detonated inside the U.S. in the event of war.
Most could cause damage equal to or greater
than the crude device Washington dropped on Hiroshima
during World War II.
The author says some of these weapons
still remain stateside in a "sleeper" status
controlled by Russian military officials who believe a
war with the U.S. "is still possible."
Others, as many as 10, might be under
al-Qaida's control, says Williams.
What kind of damage could such a weapon
do? The CIA estimates the Russian nuclear suitcases to
have an explosive yield approaching 10 kilotons.
Williams, referring to estimates by Theodore
Taylor, a prominent American physicist who miniaturized
the atomic bomb and visited the site of the World Trade
Center in 1993, says a suitcase bomb could "emit
intense thermal radiation, creating a fireball with a
diameter that would expand to 460 feet. The core of the
fireball would reach a maximum temperature of 10 million
degrees Celsius ... ." The author says the heat that
collapsed the Twin Towers never exceeded 5,000 degrees
Celsius.
Had such a bomb been used in 9/11, Williams
claims, "The World Trade Center towers, all of Wall
Street and the financial district, along with the lower
tip of Manhattan up to Gramercy Park and much of midtown,
including the theater district, would lie in ruins."
Of those who might survive the blast,
50 percent of the survivors could expect to die at the
rate of "250,000 people on any given day," Williams
reports.
And how could al-Qaida manage to transport
such weapons into the U.S.?
Williams points out that the borders with
Mexico and Canada are still dangerously porous and not
equipped to detect the smuggling of nuclear materials.
U.S. seaports are even more vulnerable,
he argues.
Though New York City would seem to be
the No. 1 target of another attack by al-Qaida, Williams
points out other U.S. cities have been mentioned in intercepted
intelligence chatter.
Among those discussed: Boston, Los Angeles,
Chicago, Dallas, Philadelphia, Miami, Washington and Rappahannock
County, Va.
Why a small rural county in Virginia?
Williams says it houses the underground command center
the White House would use in time of war.
He hastens to add that time "may
be on our side."
"It was eight years between the World
Trade Center attacks. Islam preaches patience. They will
attack when they want," Williams concluded.
More chilling was the response from the
International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N.'s nuclear
watchdog.
One official, speaking on background,
told NewsMax: "We have no comment. It is not within
our responsibility to track atomic bombs."
|