Tony Rogers
INDEX

Home

Weapons

Photo Galleries

News

Humor Pages

New Stuff

Contact Me

Tony Rogers

Surviving A Nuclear Holocaust - The Official Way
Nuclear Attack And Population Control
December 29, 2004
By: NICK REDFERN
Phenomena US Editor In Chief

All of the talk that has been in circulation since 9-11 about the possibility of terrorists attacking western countries with an atomic weapon (such as a “suitcase bomb” or a “dirty bomb”) brings back to me an intriguing event that occurred in the latter part of 2000.

Shortly before Christmas of that year, I was contacted by a source that had a remarkable story to tell. Essentially, he had acquired an original edition (not a photo-copy) of a near-200-page British Royal Air Force file that dated from the late 1960s and that dealt primarily with nuclear, biological and chemical defense issues within Britain. The file was found contained within a larger collection of books for sale at a used-books and antique store in eastern England. How the file made its way there, however, and from whom precisely, remains a mystery.

Broadly speaking, the file (a copy of which is in my possession) was intended as a training aid for a variety of Royal Air Force and other military personnel who took part in a training course in May 1968 at the Defense NBC (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical) School, Wiltshire, England. Needless to say, the contents of the file make for fascinating and disturbing reading.

As might be expected, the file contains entries with titles such as Contamination Control; Protection Against Nuclear Attack; Nuclear Fallout; Survival Shelter Design; Radioactive Sources – Storage And Transportation; and Home Office Prediction And Fallout Warnings.

The file is not without its dark side, however. In a section titled Riot Control Agents, there are guidelines informing the military how to respond to incidents involving members of the public caught in the carnage of a post-nuclear, biological or chemical holocaust. As I will shortly reveal, this is a matter of both profound controversy and significance.

Under the heading Chemical Warfare Training Aids, the file reveals how personnel assigned to the course were briefed on the dangers posed by such agents as CS Gas, Mustard Gas, Bromine, and the battlefield use of chemical agents dispatched via aircraft (in a real-life situation at the time, the file reveals, the Royal Air Force would have deployed Hunter aircraft armed with chemical weapons in response to enemy attacks) and bombs.

The file also includes a host of data on the use of Mustard Gas in training exercises. As one of the entries states: “Mustard Agent: This is the only live war agent that may be used for training. It can cause serious casualties and even death if incorrectly used.”

Nevertheless, this did not prevent the author of the document from adding that troops should be allowed to “experience Mustard Agent in the following ways: (a) a drop can be applied to the troops’ bare wrists and then decontaminated…Bleach powder can be applied to liquid Mustard to demonstrate the spontaneous combustion that takes place…Some liquid may be heated to provide vapor which the troops can then smell…”

Moving away from chemical warfare, the file devotes much of its attention to nuclear issues and what would happen – from the military’s perspective – if a localized or countrywide nuclear attack had occurred in Britain. These particular entries focus most of their attention upon the ways that the military would have assisted in attempting to coordinate some form of government in the wake of the attack. However, survivors of the holocaust would have found themselves subject to two specific pieces of Home Office legislation – (a)Public Protection and Warning; and (b) something ominously known as Justice.

That the government and the military of the time realized that in a post-nuclear attack scenario the surviving populace (that would be reduced to scattered bands of starving, irradiated and desperate souls) would pose “problems” is self-evident from scrutinizing the file.

Millions of people across the country, it states, would be suffering from (among other things): “flash blindness; retina burns; likely-to-be-fatal damage to lungs, stomach and intestines; and serious burns.” This, in turn, the file expands, inevitably would have led to “social collapse” and “riot” situations. Of course, in reality, the "rioters" would be nothing of the sort: they would simply be normal men, women and children desperate for food, water and essential provisions.

And to control the “rioters” (those taking part in the course were informed), CS Gas was seen as the preferable agent to use (for “political reasons”) and was considered quite acceptable for use on both “children and elderly people.”

How comforting to know that in the even that they even survive the unthinkable, your family members may face being subjected to CS Gas attacks for just trying to stay alive.

But, incredibly, in the aftermath of such an attack, the military was seen as being unlikely to fare much better. For example, personnel were told that to try and gauge the extent to which the country had been contaminated by nuclear radiation, “men are going to be deliberately exposed to residual radiation.” The file makes it very clear that strict guidelines were to be enforced to keep exposure to a minimum; however, that some personnel would suffer adversely in a real-life scenario seems inevitable.

The file continues in a similar vein and detail the precautions to be taken with respect to chemical and nuclear agents; how the military would operate in a post-holocaust environment; and the way in which military personnel should be trained both physically and psychologically to cope with the shock and realization of seeing the British Isles reduced to an irradiated and ruined land.

But it is without doubt the areas of “riot control” and the vaguely defined “justice” that give most cause for concern. The East-West Cold War is now over. However, if we should one day face the unthinkable (suitcase bombs and dirty bombs smuggled into a Western country by supporters of terrorism and detonated to create maximum devastation), it is a sobering thought to see what else we, the public, might face in addition to the horrors of nuclear destruction – and not just from our enemies, but from our own governments as they put into place these dark and disturbing plans for controlling the surviving, post-attack population.

 

TonyRogers.com Navigation Links

Home | Weapons | Photo Galleries | News | New Stuff | Contact Me